Back to list

AI Products虎嗅

2,000 Yuan Cheaper Than Doubao Phone: StepFun Takes On ByteDance

虎嗅1 min read
Read original
2,000 Yuan Cheaper Than Doubao Phone: StepFun Takes On ByteDance

AI Summary

StepFun has launched the StepX Neo agent smartphone at 3,999 yuan, 2,000 yuan less than ByteDance's Doubao agent phone. It is pushing price, voice interaction, and an open ecosystem to win users, but a live demo failed to complete a multi-step task, showing the product is still maturing.

AI Insights

StepX Neo's 2,000 yuan price cut versus Doubao's Agent phone signals that Stepfun is using price and an open third-party ecosystem to compensate for its smaller C-end user base, while entering hardware directly rather than partnering with an existing phone maker as ByteDance did. However, the live test failure on a multi-step task shows that Agent phones remain immature, and whether consumers will pay for unfinished agent capabilities will depend on how fast reliability improves.

Analysis written by AI from the original article. Check it against the source.

Translated text

StepFun officially launched the StepX Neo agent smartphone on October 13 at 3,999 yuan, 2,000 yuan less than ByteDance's Doubao agent phone (5,999 yuan) released in September. Along with it, StepFun unveiled the STEPX Token Plan, giving users free monthly tokens in the tens of billions. Pre-sales began that night on JD, Tmall, and Douyin, with official sales on October 16. The phone emphasizes voice interaction with six microphones, along with lightweight design and appearance. StepFun claims an open ecosystem, partnering with nearly 100 firms including Alipay, Tencent, Ctrip, Didi, Amap, and Meituan, with its built-in personal agent Amoo intended to perform tasks across multiple apps. However, in a hands-on test, the phone failed to complete a relatively simple request to order a cake and deliver it to a hotel, returning to a previous task instead. Staff said the product is at version 1.0, with app compatibility and system stability still being improved. Reviewers note that unlike chatbots, agent phones execute real transactions, so failures force users to double-check or take over. It remains unclear why consumers should pay 3,999 yuan for a device whose agent capabilities are still maturing. The two companies also differ in strategy: ByteDance partnered with ZTE to add Doubao capabilities to existing hardware, while StepFun built its own device brand, 'StepFun Terminal', and entered hardware directly. With a much smaller user base than ByteDance, StepFun appears to be using the lower price to attract early adopters and gather real-world usage data.

Related News

3

AI Products36氪

Geeks Build Cabbage-Priced Biped Robot for Under 3,000 Yuan, with Old Phones as Key Contributors

UCLA's RoMeLa lab has developed PhoneBot, a 1.8 kg biped robot with 13 degrees of freedom and a materials cost of about $400 (roughly 2,677 yuan). The robot is powered by a smartphone that serves as its sensor suite, onboard computer, and interface, and by using used older phones, total cost stays under 3,000 yuan.

AI Products36氪

Alibaba, ByteDance and Meta Ignite Personal Agent Race: No Table Without a Good Model

In late September, Alibaba announced at its Yunqi Conference that Qwen (Tongyi Qianwen) would accelerate personal agent development, and on October 13 it unveiled 'Qwen Go!', a personal assistant in limited invitation testing. ByteDance (Doubao), Tencent and others have also launched personal agent projects, sparked by Meta's Muse. On the model side, Meta's Muse Wonder and Alibaba's QwenGyre reinforcement-learning framework aim to strengthen long-running agent capabilities.

AI Products36氪

Tech Giants at Home and Abroad Scramble for the Muse Entrance, But the Personal Agent Remains a False Proposition

A month after Meta launched the personal agent Muse, touted as the most captivating product since ChatGPT, ByteDance, Tencent, Alibaba, and Ant Group have rushed out similar offerings. However, Muse's daily net new users fell 62.4% from the September peak, and analysis suggests the model struggles to fit the domestic Chinese market in both product logic and business model.